Among advanced ceramics, alumina (Al2O3) and zirconia ceramics stand out as the two most widely used materials. Are you curious about their performance advantages and disadvantages? Please follow the article to explore!
Quick Links
Alumina vs. Zirconia
Alumina is one of the most commonly used advanced ceramics. Due to its excellent hardness, excellent thermal conductivity, outstanding electrical insulation properties, and low cost, alumina has become the material of choice in many industrial applications.
Zirconia, especially the stable form of yttrium-stabilized zirconia (YSZ), has represented the cutting-edge technology of ceramic engineering. With its outstanding mechanical strength, excellent wear resistance and chemical stability, zirconia has carved out its own market. Although the production cost of zirconia is higher than that of alumina, its unique combination of properties makes it indispensable in some high-demand scenarios.
Core performance comparison
|
Performance |
Parameters |
Alumina |
Zirconia |
|
Physical properties |
Density |
3.7-3.95 g/cm³ |
5.68-6.05 g/cm³ |
|
Surface roughness |
Ra0.2~Ra0.4 |
Ra0.02 |
|
|
Hardness (Mohs) |
9 |
8.5 |
|
|
Mechanical properties |
Tension strength |
78 MPa |
330 MPa |
|
Elastic limit |
273 MPa |
413 MPa |
|
|
Modulus of rupture |
476 MPa |
588 MPa |
|
|
Compressive strength |
2100-2600 MPa |
2000-2500 MPa |
|
|
Thermal properties |
Thermal conductivity |
24-29 W/mK |
2-3 W/mK |
|
Thermal expansion coefficient |
8.0×10⁻⁶/K |
10.5×10⁻⁶/K |
|
|
Maximum use temperature |
1750°C |
2400°C |
|
|
Thermal shock resistance |
Excellent |
Good |
|
|
Electrical properties |
Volume resistivity |
>10¹⁴ Ω·cm |
>10¹⁰ Ω·cm |
|
Dielectric constant |
9.8 |
12.5 |
|
|
Chemical properties |
Acid resistance |
Good |
Excellent |
|
Alkali resistance |
Good |
Excellent |
|
|
Corrosion resistance |
Good |
Excellent |
|
|
Other features |
Biocompatibility |
Excellent |
Excellent |
|
Wear resistance |
Good |
Excellent |
|
|
Relative cost |
Low |
High |
Density and strength
There are significant differences in the physical properties of zirconia and alumina. The density of zirconium oxide (5.68-6.05 g/cm³) is higher than that of aluminum oxide (3.7-3.95 g/cm³), which makes zirconium oxide advantageous in some applications that require high density. High density not only provides better compression Performance, but also can make zirconia products have a more delicate internal structure.
Strength performance
In terms of strength performance, zirconia also shows obvious advantages. Its tensile strength reaches 330 MPa, which is much higher than the 78 MPa of alumina. Therefore, zirconia will perform better in some environments that need to withstand high stress.
In addition, the elastic limit of zirconia is 413 MPa, and the modulus of rupture reaches 588 MPa, while alumina is only 273 MPa and 476 MPa. The advantages of zirconia in bearing mechanical loads and anti-fracture performance will be more obvious.
Surface treatment and precision
The quality of surface treatment is an important indicator for measuring ceramic materials. After precision machining, the surface finish of zirconia can generally reach Ra0.02, while the surface roughness of aluminum oxide is between Ra0.2 and Ra0.4. The excellent surface treatment characteristics of zirconia give it a mirror-like smooth effect, which has important application value in fields such as precision mechanical parts and medical equipment.
In terms of friction coefficient, zirconia also has a lower friction coefficient, which can reduce wear between mating parts. In the wear resistance test, zirconia has very strong wear resistance.
Thermal properties
In terms of thermal properties, alumina and zirconia have their own characteristics. Alumina has higher thermal conductivity and is more advantageous in some scenarios where heat dissipation is required; while zirconia has lower thermal conductivity and excellent thermal shock resistance, which is particularly advantageous in environments with drastic temperature changes.
Electrical properties
Alumina is an excellent electrical insulator with very low electrical conductivity, suitable for various electronic components and insulating parts. Such as insulating substrates and electronic packaging and other insulating parts.
Application Field Analysis
In the field of industrial manufacturing, alumina and zirconia ceramics play an important role in multiple key application scenarios due to their excellent performance characteristics.
Grinding
In some grinding applications, alumina and zirconia can be used as grinding media and grinding jars materials. The wear resistance of zirconium oxide is more significant. The high density and excellent surface finish can greatly improve the grinding efficiency and reduce the risk of contamination.
Valves, pumps
In the application of ceramic parts in valves and pumps, zirconium oxide and aluminum oxide have their own advantages in different specific applications. Zirconium oxide has excellent corrosion resistance and mechanical strength, which makes it more advantageous in some highly harsh environments; while aluminum oxide ceramics are the first choice material under general working conditions due to their comprehensive performance and good cost performance.
Bearing balls
In the application of bearing balls, zirconium oxide becomes an ideal material because of its higher density and excellent surface finish, and its low friction coefficient and excellent wear resistance also ensure the long-term reliable operation of the bearing.
Mortar and pestle
Both materials have their own unique advantages as mortar and pestle, aluminum oxide is more cost-effective, while zirconium oxide is more wear-resistant.
Dental implants
In dental implants, both materials are involved, but zirconium oxide has attracted more attention due to its better biocompatibility and aesthetic performance. Compared with metal porcelain crowns, zirconium oxide crowns have shown more obvious advantages, with better aesthetic effects, higher biocompatibility, and better durability.
Cost-Effectiveness
Raw material cost
In terms of raw material acquisition, alumina has more advantages. The storage of aluminum in the earth’s crust is very good, which gives alumina a stable supply of raw materials and relatively low processing. In contrast, the source of raw materials for zirconia is relatively limited, especially for rare earth elements such as yttrium used to stabilize zirconia. The scarcity of supply will make its price higher.
In terms of raw material processing, the processing technology of zirconia is more mature. From bauxite to the refining of high-purity alumina, modern times have good industrialization and scale, which can be supplied quickly. Zirconia requires more complex purification and stabilization treatment, especially for the preparation of high-performance zirconia ceramics, which requires more rigorous and complex processes.
Market prices show that the cost of zirconia is usually more than twice that of high-grade alumina, which is determined by many factors.
Processing cost
The complexity of the manufacturing process significantly affects the price cost of both materials. The processing of zirconia is more complicated and requires you to be equipped with sophisticated equipment and more stringent standards.
In terms of processing time, the processing time of zirconia material is usually several times that of alumina. To achieve the same processing accuracy, zirconia requires longer grinding time and more processes, which not only increases the cost, but also Reduced generation efficiency.
In terms of equipment wear, machining zirconia places higher demands on equipment and consumes more diamond tools, which will force your production and maintenance costs to increase.
Use value
Zirconium oxide products generally have a longer lifespan, and their mechanical properties and wear resistance are better than aluminum oxide products in some harsh environments.
Although the cost of zirconium oxide is relatively high, its high performance and durability can also give you a better return, especially in high-end application fields, where the advantages of high performance can be converted into more obvious economic benefits.
Selection Guide
When choosing between alumina and zirconia, you need to be clear about your application scenario.
1. In high-temperature applications, alumina has better thermal stability and is suitable for use in continuous high-temperature environments. Although zirconia has a higher melting point, you need to pay special attention to its thermal shock resistance in environments with drastic temperature fluctuations.
2. Zirconia can withstand more complex and demanding mechanical loads with its stronger mechanical strength and excellent compressive resistance. Alumina is more suitable for use in medium and low pressure environments.
3. If your application is exposed to some corrosive chemical environments, then zirconium oxide is more recommended, which shows excellent chemical stability, especially in corrosive environments such as strong acids and strong alkalis, and has strong radiation resistance. Although alumina also has good chemical stability, it requires additional protective measures in some special chemical environments.
4. For the evaluation of mechanical stress levels, you need to fully consider the various stress forms in actual applications. Zirconia has a relatively good performance in bearing some complex mechanical stresses, especially in the face of some tensile, compressive and shear stresses. Alumina is more suitable for use in environments where mechanical stress is relatively stable and predictable.
Summary
Both zirconia and alumina are commonly used ceramic materials. They have their own unique advantages and you need to choose them according to the specific application requirements.